Legal Opinion

Lowrie & Robinson Lumber Co. v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts) . Plaintiff called as a witness the street opening clerk in the city assessor’s office and examined him at length. From his testimony it would appear that he worked out the detail of the assessment. The assessment was on a front foot basis; on the lands of plaintiff, it was $3.25 a foot front. The testimony of the witness was to the effect that if Oakman was credited with the assessed value of the strip of land dedicated by him as of the date of the dedication he would be entitled to a credit of $3.78 a foot front, and, therefore, would have no assessment to pay and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Newport Mining Co. v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Atwell v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Brown v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lundbom v. City of ManisteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re Petition of MacOmb Cty. Drain Com'rMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Doherty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Reliance Automobile & Supply Co. v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. C. A. Roberts Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API