Legal Opinion

Campbell v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 157, Calendar No. 36,428PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an appeal from an adjudication that Rugby boulevard, now renamed Forrer avenue, in the city of Detroit, is in fact and law a boulevard from Grand River avenue to Fenkell avenue, and property abutting thereon is not subject to special assessment' for paving. Rugby subdivision was platted in the township of Redford, Wayne county, in October, 1913, and the proprietors thereof, in accordance with the mandatory language of the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13209), dedicated to the use of the public “the streets and alleys shown on said plat.” Rugby boulevard extended the length of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Oprisiu v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Doherty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Coburn v. City of WyandotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. MacOmb Building Co. v. Clinton TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API