Legal Opinion

Panfil v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 167, Calendar No. 33,920PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

In 1923 the plaintiffs owned and occupied as a residence in the city of Detroit certain property which will he referred to herein as lot 79 of Smart Farm subdivision. Incident to the opening and widening of McGraw avenue, this lot, as a part of a special assessment district to which 60 per cent, of the cost of the improvement was apportioned by the common council, was assessed $1,440. It was also assessed $1,781.72 for paving, and $198.28 for constructing a sidewalk on McGraw avenue. The plaintiffs claim that these assessments so levied are illegal and excessive in amount, and that they have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GainMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Scotten v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Doherty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Jend v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hatch v. Michigan Central Railroad Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Widening of Fulton StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Blades v. Genesee County Drain DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. St. Joseph Township v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API