Dyckman v. . the Mayor, C. of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from the general term of the Supreme Court, in the first district, where a nonsuit entered on the trial had been affirmed, and judgment perfected in favor of the defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the general term of the Supreme Court, in the first district, where a nonsuit entered on the trial had been affirmed, and judgment perfected in favor of the defendant. (Reported below, 7 Barb. 498.) This was an ejectment by William W. Dyckman against the corporation of the city of New York for an undivided seventh part of a piece of land in Greenburgh, Westchester county, which had been appropriated by the Croton water-commissioners for the construction of their aqueduct. *On the trial, in 1846, before Barculo, J., the plaintiff’s title, which was admitted by the defendant’s…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action of ejectment to recover an undivided seventh part of a piece of land in Westchester county, forming a portion of the site of the Croton aqueduct. The respondents are in possession,…
2Cited by34 opinions
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore Railroad v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.