Legal Opinion

Meyer v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 137, Calendar No. 36,187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

A plat of parts of sections 11 and 12 in the township of Greenfield, in Wayne county, was executed by the owner of the lands, the Russel Woods Company, on January 26, 1916, and designated “Russel Woods Sub’n.” It was approved by the township board of that township and the board of county auditors of the county of Wayne, and thereafter duly recorded. In November of that year, the territory embraced in it was taken into and became a part of the city of Detroit.

The principal street in the plat is designated “Broadstreet Boulevard.” It is 100 feet wide, and extends the full length of the plat…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Oprisiu v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. MacLachlan v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Theisen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Doherty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API