Legal Opinion

Borgman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Bill to restrain the collection of taxes. Defendants appeal. The facts are 'stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a bill filed by complainants to restrain the collection of a tax imposed by the common council of the city of Detroit for the opening of Noble street between Seventh and Eighth. The chief ground of contention, and the only one which we think calls for discussion, is that the proceedings taken to condemn the lands are void because less than 12 jurors sat in the case, and determined the questions of public necessity and the amount of damages.

The proceedings were had under Act No. 124, Laws of 1883, as amended. This act provides for the impaneling of a jury which shall be composed of 12…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hinkley v. BishoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Scotten v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Roberts v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Doherty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Smith v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API