Legal Opinion
Chronic Pain Associates, Inc. v. Bubenik
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 15, 1994No. 80911, 80979 and 83204PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
This proceeding involves two original actions between the same parties in this Court, Okla.Sup.Ct. Nos. 80,911 and 83,204, both of which arise from a controversy in the District Court of Tulsa County. Cause No. 80,-911 is the surviving number after consolidation with yet a third original action, No. 80,979. We do not consolidate the actions, but issue one opinion resolving both.
The case concerns a physician, Gilliland, the doctor’s former employer, Chronic Pain Associates (Chronic Pain), and arbitration of the doctor’s claim based on contract upon termination of his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Ingram v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Atoka CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Poulos v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Movants to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- HUNSUCKER v. FALLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Smedsrud v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.