Legal Opinion
HUNSUCKER v. FALLIN
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 19, 2017No. 116,131PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON,-J.
¶1 Petitioners filed applications for the Court to ■ assume ■ original jurisdiction' and grant extraordinary declaratory and injunc-tive relief. Petitioners have four constitutional claims. Two claims attack the constitutionality of Oklahoma Senate Bill No. 643, the Impaired Driving Elimination' Act 2 (IDEA2). Two claims attack the constitutionality of the Governor’s Executive Order 2017-19, promulgated on June 8, 2017, and designed to implement a portion of S.B. No. 643.
¶ 2 We hold the Impaired Driving Elimination Act 2 is unconstitutional in its entirety due to violating the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- COLE v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- OWENS v. ZUMWALTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- OWENS v. ZUMWALTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.