Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Atoka County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 24, 1969No. 43391PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This is an original action for mandamus by the plaintiff, State of Oklahoma on relation of the Attorney General, against the Boards of County Commissioners and the Excise Boards, and the individual members thereof, of Atoka and Coal Counties.
Briefly stated the facts are that appropriations were made in Atoka and Coal Counties to pay one-half of the salary of one assistant district attorney in each of said counties for all or a portion of the fiscal year ending June 30, 1969.
The Attorney General brought actions in the district courts of Coal and Atoka Counties for mandamus to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Frantz v. AutrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Excise Board v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Davis v. McCartySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- State Ex Rel. City of Shawnee v. ShortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ethics Commission v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Keating v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Association of Classroom Teachers of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Independent School District 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Chronic Pain Associates, Inc. v. BubenikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.