Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Oneok, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 30, 1989No. 68187PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice.

The controversy in this novel case on certiorari is whether the two-year statute of limitations prescribed by 12 O.S.1981 § 95 (Third) or the three-year limitation period of 12 O.S.1981 § 95 (Second) governs the time to commence proceedings under the Workers’ Compensation Retaliatory Discharge Act, 85 O.S.1981 §§ 5-7. The underlying issue for decision is whether the Retaliatory Discharge Act created a new cause of action based upon a statutory liability other than penalty or forfeiture.

The Oklahoma Legislature enacted 85 O.S.1981 §§ 5-7 to prohibit discrimination against…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Hall v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Williams v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. WRG Construction Co. v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. Pytlik v. Professional Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API