Legal Opinion
Hadnot v. Shaw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 11, 1992No. 72961PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Chief Justice.
Six issues are presented by this appeal: [1] Did the trial court correctly exclude from consideration the plaintiffs' (nonmovants’) notice of filing exhibits as a sanction for their noncompliance with summary judgment procedure? [2] Did the plaintiffs timely raise the issue whether summary judgment was premature? [3] Did the plaintiffs show any material fact issue? [4] Did the trial court err in ruling out all of the plaintiffs’ theories of liability fairly comprised within the evidentiary materials before it? [5] Is summary judgment for the defendants inconsistent with…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Torcaso v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Seitsinger v. Dockum Pontiac Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.