Legal Opinion

Berryhill v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 2014No. Nos. 111,492, 111,961, 112,573PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

T1 This proceeding involves a request for an extraordinary writ that is recast as appeal from an order in a guardianship that adjudicated the wards' selection of counsel and adjudicated a motion concerning unsupervised visitation and selection of a guardian. This proceeding also involves two requests for extraordinary relief that were made during the appeal.1 The first involves an emer-geney motion for modification of supervised visitation and the second involves the trial court's order quashing subpoenas. The Ber-ryhills state that there was no evidence to support the trial court's…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Heffron v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. HUNSUCKER v. FALLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. CoburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API