Estate of Blalock
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Lillian Grace Blalock, deceased, left a purported holographic will which was admitted to probate, the respondent, Florence Dorothy Driggs, a niece of the testatrix, named in the will, being appointed administratrix with the will annexed.
The will in controversy, written upon two sheets of lined paper apparently torn from a small memorandum book, is as follows:
Shortly before the expiration of the six-months’ period within which a contest of a will after its probate may be filed (Prob. Code, § 380), the husband of decedent filed a contest upon the sole ground “That said purported will was not at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Estate of RicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Russell v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Mitchell v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. MunzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Estate of CaruchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Estate of BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Estate of CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- De Moulin v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.