Legal Opinion

Estate of Boyd

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1957No. Civ. 21908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This controversy arose out of a petition filed by the administratrix with will annexed to determine heirship.

The question involved is whether oral testimony is admissible to prove the attending facts and circumstances as to the family relations of the testator in order to determine the objects of the testator’s bounty.

Mahala M. Boyd deceased on December 23, 1950 at the age of 83. Her holographic will dated September 4, 1948, was duly admitted to probate. Martha B. White, her daughter, was appointed administratrix with will annexed and appropriate letters were issued to her. The estate was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estate of NorthcuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hunsinger v. LandgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. O'Connor v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estate of KarkeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. SelixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Estate of PlumerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Fries v. BeadlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Estate of WochosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API