Mitchell v. Donohue
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County admitting a will to probate and from an order denying a new trial of a contest as to its probate. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
For the reasons given in the opinion filed by this department June 27, 1893, the judgment and orders appealed from are affirmed.
The following is the opinion above referred to:
Belcher, C.
Patrick Donohue died in San Luis Obispo county on the nineteenth day of February, 1892, leaving surviving his wife, the respondent, Kate Donohue, but no children, and also leaving an estate, consisting of real and personal property of the value of about fifteen thousand dollars. His heirs-at-law, other than his widow, were one sister and several nephews and nieces, children of two deceased brothers.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re Estate of SkerrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Clarke v. RansomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- In re the Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Estate of SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re Estate of SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Blizzard v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Pate v. BushongIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.