Legal Opinion

Estate of Ricks

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1911No. S.F. No. 5152PublishedCited by 52 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County revoking the probate of a codicil to a will and from an order refusing a new trial. G. W. Hunter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

was a contest after probate, attacking

a will and codicil. At the close of the case of contestant the court granted a nonsuit as to the contest of the will and denied it as to the codicil. Contestant appealed from the judgment on the nonsuit as to the will, which judgment, in an opinion This this day filed, has been affirmed. (Estate of Ricks, S. F. No. 5246, ante, p. 450, [117 Pac. 532].) On the denial of the motion for a nonsuit as to the codicil the trial thereon was proceeded with, resulting in a disagreement of the jury. On a second trial as to said codicil, a verdict was rendered in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Estate of GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In Re Estate of KilbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. In Re the Estate of NewhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API