Wilson v. McConnachie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. W. H. Clark, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by the proponents *265of the will of Bridget Wilson, deceased, which was probated on May 9, 1893, from a judgment vacating the probate and from an order denying proponent's motion for a new trial.
The said Bridget Wilson died on the fourteenth day of March, 1893, at Los Angeles, California. She left a will, dated February 27, 1893, and executed on that day, and a codicil to said will, executed and dated on the 11th of March, 1893. These two instruments were admitted to probate as constituting the last will and testament of the deceased. She left no children or lineal descendants,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Peck v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Herwick v. LangfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Carty v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.