Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1922No. S. F. No. 9883PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order revoking the probate of a will on a contest instituted after probate. The grounds of contest were insufficient execution, undue influence and mental incompeteney. A nonsuit was granted as to the first two grounds, and the issue submitted to the jury on the third, resulting in a verdict for the contestant. Proponents appeal on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence and errors of law. Contestant is a daughter of the testator, and the will under contest bequeathed the entire estate to Ella F. Russell, the second wife, and named her and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of RicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In re Estate of RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API