Legal Opinion

De Moulin v. Richards

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1950No. Civ. 17881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

Appeal from an order settling final account and for distribution, wherein it was ordered, among other things, that the residue of the estate be distributed to Mary E. De Moulin, the surviving spouse of the testator. The appellants, who are the daughter and son of the testator by a former marriage, contend that the testator did not dispose of the residue by his will, and that it should have been distributed under the laws of succession—one-third each to the daughter, son, and surviving spouse.

Horace Louis De Moulin died on November 1,1948. He left a last will which was as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. DeParcq v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estate of BlalockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Estate of KlewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Matter of Estate of SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Estate of BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Estate of McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API