Legal Opinion
Williams v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 11, 1989No. CA A50932PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole setting his release date. ORS 144.335. He contends that, in overriding one minimum sentence and sustaining another, the Board applied new rules that took effect after his convictions, contrary to the ex post facto provisions of the Oregon 1 and federal 2 constitutions. We affirm.
In 1986, the trial court convicted petitioner of rape and burglary and sentenced him to 20 years in prison, with a minimum sentence of 10 years for each offense. The sentences were to run consecutively. Under the rules then in effect, 3 when a court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- George William Nulph v. Vern Faatz, Chairman, Oregon State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Jerrold S. Flemming v. Oregon Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.