Legal Opinion

State v. Burke

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 25, 1991No. 86-1797-C-2, 86-1798-C-2; CA A63692PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*9ROSSMAN, J.

The state appeals an order that set aside defendant’s conviction, pursuant to ORS 137.225. The issue is whether a conviction for child abuse can be “expunged”1 from one’s criminal record after the effective date of a statutory amendment that expressly prevents convictions for that offense from being set aside. We hold that it cannot, and reverse.

In September, 1986, defendant was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.425. The victim was a four-year-old girl. Under the statutory scheme that allows certain convictions to be set aside three years after the successful…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Boone v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. DufortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API