Legal Opinion

Warden v. Marrero

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1974No. 73-831PublishedCited by 279 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

A now-repealed statute, 26 U. S. C. § 7237 (d),1 provided, inter alia, that certain narcotics offenders sentenced to mandatory minimum prison terms should be ineligible for parole under the general parole statute, 18 TJ. S. C. *655§ 4202.2 Section 7237 (d) was repealed, effective May 1, 1971, 84 Stat. 1292, by the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, which makes parole under § 4202 available for almost all narcotics offenders. The question for decision in this case is whether the parole ineligibility provision of 26 U. S. C. § 7237 (d) survives the repealer, so that a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by279 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Harry Allen Plyler v. Michael W. Moore, Director, South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Jones v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  5. Kaylor v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API