Legal Opinion

George William Nulph v. Vern Faatz, Chairman, Oregon State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1994No. 91-36304PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

George William Nulph, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Nulph claims that the Oregon State Board of Parole violated the Ex Post Facto Clause when it set his release date in accordance with statutes and regulations adopted after the date of his offense. Because the Board retrospectively applied a statute which significantly increased Nulph’s parole matrix range, we reverse.

I

On November 5, 1986, George William Nulph was convicted in state court of multiple felony counts (including one count of being an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Willy Elmer SweetenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Neal v. ShimodaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Cort v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of StanphillWashington Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API