Legal Opinion
Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2003No. 01-35311PublishedCited by 333 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge.
The Oregon State Board of Parole and PosL-Prison Supervision (“the Board of Parole”) found that Robert Lewis Himes had violated the terms of his parole and ordered him re-incarcerated to serve twenty-nine and one half additional years. The Board of Parole based its decision on parole regulations more onerous than those in place at the time Himes committed the offense for which he was incarcerated. The question for decision is whether that determination violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. U.S. Const, art. I, § 10. We conclude that…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by333 opinions
- Delgadillo v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Marvin Walker v. Michael MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Michael Su Chia v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Aaron Reynoso v. George J. Giurbino, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
328 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.