Legal Opinion
Williams v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 5, 1991No. CA A64077PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole resetting his parole release date. ORS 144.335. He contends that the Board applied rules that took effect after the commission of the crimes for which he was sentenced, contrary to the ex post facto provisions of the Oregon 1 and federal 2 constitutions.
In 1986, petitioner was convicted of rape and burglary and given an indeterminate sentence with a maximum of 20 years and a minimum of 10 years in prison for each offense. The sentences were to run consecutively. At his initial prison term hearing in 1987, the Board declined to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Howard v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Jerrold S. Flemming v. Oregon Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Byrnes v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.