Legal Opinion

Jerrold S. Flemming v. Oregon Board of Parole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1993No. 92-35151PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge: .

Jerrold S. Flemming, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Flemming contends that the district court erred in concluding that the Oregon Board of Parole (“Board”) did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause, U.S. Const. art. I, § 10, cl. 1, when it applied a regulation retroactively in calculating Flemming’s parole release date. We agree and therefore reverse.

I

In 1981, Flemming was convicted of multiple sex offenses under Oregon state law. At the time of his crimes, a state parole regulation provided…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Ewell v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Cort v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Raymond Joseph JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API