Legal Opinion
Neuhaus v. DeCholnoky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 29, 2004No. AC 23317; AC 23946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
This appeal requires us to consider the application of the repose section of the statute of limitations, General Statutes § 52-584, to a medical malpractice action brought on behalf of a disabled minor child by his parents. The plaintiffs, Christopher Neuhaus and his parents, David Neuhaus and Andrea Neuhaus, individually and on behalf of Christopher, appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial corut in favor of the defendants, Corinne DeCholnoky, an obstetrician and gynecologist, and Stamford Hospital (hospital), on their defense that the plaintiffs’ action is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Blanchette v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bound Brook Ass'n v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neuhaus v. DeCholnokySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Pagan v. Carey Wiping Materials Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Neuhaus v. DecholnokySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Neuhaus v. DecholnokySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Ceferatti v. AranowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014