Legal Opinion
Bound Brook Ass'n v. City of Norwalk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 18, 1986No. 12209; 12212PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue on this appeal is whether the defendants, the city of Norwalk (hereinafter Norwalk), and William R. Guarnieri, the former chief building inspector for Norwalk, fraudulently concealed the existence of a cause of action so as to toll the running of a statute of limitations. The plaintiffs, owners and former owners of houses in the Bound Brook Estates subdivision in Norwalk, commenced a suit against the defendants1 by complaint dated September 19, 1978. In that complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were liable for negligence, nuisance, negligent nuisance, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Lippitt v. AshleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.