Legal Opinion

Neuhaus v. DeCholnoky

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 3, 2006No. 17249, 17250PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

These jointly filed appeals involve the applicability of the three year statute of repose con tained in General Statutes § 52-584 1 to a medical malpractice action brought against two separate defendants. More specifically, the question before us is whether the plaintiffs’ claims against the defendants 2 were time barred, or whether the statute of repose was tolled with respect to either of the defendants by the continuing course of conduct doctrine. The defendant Stamford Hospital (hospital) appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s summary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  3. Martinelli v. FusiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Tayco Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Lee v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API