Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
In this certified appeal, the plaintiff claims1 that the trial court improperly concluded, in granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant David Lobdell (defendant),2 that his action was barred by the three year statute of repose contained in General Statutes § 52-584.3 We conclude that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the statute of repose contained in § 52-584 was tolled by the contin*365uing course of conduct doctrine because of the defendant’s alleged ongoing failure to report to the plaintiff the totality of his diagnosis. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Miles v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Neuhaus v. DeCholnokySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.