Legal Opinion
Neuhaus v. Decholnoky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 8, 2004No. SC 17250PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 576 (AC 23946), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court improperly determine that the plaintiffs’ claims against the named defendant, Corinne DeCholnoky, were barred by the three year repose section of General Statutes § 52-584, and that the continuing course of conduct doctrine did not apply?”
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Neuhaus v. DeCholnokyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Neuhaus v. DeCholnokySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006