Legal Opinion

Blanchette v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 23, 1994No. 14745PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this medical malpractice case is whether the “continuous treatment” or “continuing course of conduct” doctrine tolls the repose section of the statute of limitations, General Statutes § 52-584,1 which disallows any action brought more than three years from the date of a physician's álleged misconduct. The named plaintiff, Evelyn E. Blanchette,2 filed a complaint charging the defendant, *259Frederick C. Barrett, a physician, with having negligently failed to exercise reasonable medical care in his diagnosis and treatment of her breast condition, which was subsequently found…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Watts v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API