Legal Opinion

Gaines v. Sun Refinery and Marketing

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1990No. 69139PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

Claimant sought compensation for loss of pulmonary function. The Workers’ Compensation Court denied benefits but the Court of Appeals reversed. We granted certiorari to address the issue of whether the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court was supported by any competent evidence. Because we find that all medical reports submitted as evidence failed to comply with A.M.A. Guidelines, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. We further set forth the rule to be applied hereafter in order to obtain appellate review of medical reports, and revise our earlier position as to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Whitener v. South Central Solid Waste AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Lacy v. Schlumberger Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. American Airlines v. HerveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Davis v. BF GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Hammons v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API