Legal Opinion
Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 5, 1986No. 61112PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
This appeal presents for our decision four questions dealing with the standards of adequate notice for Corporation Commission spacing proceedings: [1] Is the Corporation Commission called upon to act in an adjudicative capacity when its statutory power is invoked to establish a drilling and spacing unit? [2] In Corporation Commission proceedings to establish a drilling and spacing unit, is notice to interested persons subject to the minimum standards of fairness exacted by the Due Process Clause? [3] Do the standards of due process, announced by this court in Cravens v.…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Bosh v. Cherokee County Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.