Legal Opinion
Lacy v. Schlumberger Well Service
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 28, 1992No. 72418PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice.
In this case, Thomas Lacy (“Claimant”), an employee, filed a claim in the Workers’ Compensation Court (“trial court”) alleging that his lungs and upper respiratory system had been injured by continuous exposure to chemicals during his almost thirteen years of employment. The employer, Schlumberger Well Service (“Employer”), denied that claimant had any job-related injury or disability. At trial, employer offered several witnesses, a number of medical records, and the deposition testimony of M.B. Shook, M.D., to support its defense.
Dr. Shook is a board certified internal…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Benning v. Pennwell Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.