Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
Sunburst Oil & Refining Company, the respondent, brought suit against petitioner, Great Northern Railway Company, to recover payments claimed to be overcharges for freight. The charges were in conformity with a tariff schedule approved by the Railroad Commission of Montana for intrastate traffic. After payment had been made, the same Commission which had approved the schedule held, upon a complaint by the shipper, th'at the ratesi so approved were excessive and unreasonable. In this action to recover the excess so paid, the shipper recovered a judgment which was affirmed upon appeal. 91 Mont.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by848 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
843 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.