Legal Opinion

Special Indemnity Fund v. Stockton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1982No. 56509PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Vice Chief Justice:

We granted certiorari in this case to examine two questions of first impression, both requiring interpretation of the Workers’ Compensation Act of 1977. The specific issues addressed are:

1. Can a claimant who has worked continuously since the occurrence of a work related injury and who is still employed at the time of the compensation hearing be classified as 100% totally and permanently disabled within the meaning of 85 O.S.1981 § 3(12)?

2. When a medical report in a worker’s compensation case consists only of the history of the claimant’s injuries and a conclusion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Wade Lahar Construction Company v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Dierks Lbr. & Coal Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Allgood v. AllgoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Whitener v. South Central Solid Waste AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. LaBarge v. ZebcoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. George E. Failing Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API