Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
The plaintiffs, Bill R. Middlebrook and Melynda K. Middlebrook, brought two actions against Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.’s, Inc., a corporation, Bone & Joint Orthopedics, Inc., a corporation, Robert L. Imler, M.D., and J.L. Richardson, M.D., for damages arising from surgical treatment of a spinal injury suffered by Mr. Middle-*577brook and a derivative action for loss of consortium arising therefrom. After an extensive trial, the cause was submitted to a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of all defendants on the cause of action arising from the rupture of a portion of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Bridges v. City of RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Buzzard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.