Legal Opinion
Davis v. BF Goodrich
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 1992No. 72080PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
The issue on appeal is whether there is any competent evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s finding that the claimant did not sustain or suffer an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. We find that the Workers’ Compensation Court’s order is supported by competent evidence.
Ronnie Davis (claimant) filed a workers’ compensation claim alleging injury to his lungs and upper respiratory system caused by continuous exposure to hazardous chemicals, including industrial talc, and fumes, while employed by B.F. Goodrich…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- York v. Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Orrell v. BF GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Branstetter v. TRW/Reda PumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
3Cited by30 opinions
- Amos v. Spiro Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Keller v. L. A. Darling FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Beets v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Yeatman v. Northern Oklahoma Resource Center of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Bird Construction Co. v. Oklahoma City Housing AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.