Legal Opinion

Kutschinski v. Thompson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 24, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill for specific performance of a contract for the sale of lands, with abatement of the purchase price because of an easement referred to as a mill-race, constituting an encumbrance of the title.

The contract bears date April 30th, 1926, and was entered into between the defendants, Hallie C. Thompson and Clarence A. Thompson, her husband, as vendors, and Samuel E. Houston, as vendee. Defendants agreed therein to convey to said vendee a tract of land in the city of Summit, New Jersey, upon which there is a one-family dwelling and a garage. The consideration named is $13,500, payable…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Propper v. ColsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  2. Aron v. Rialto Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Breitman v. JaehnalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  5. Hoy v. BramhallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. City of Olympia v. PalzerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Boyd v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Dickson v. KatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Bertrand v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API