Boyd v. McDonald
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
Appellants here, defendants below, William Boyd and his wife Ruth, appeal a declaratory judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court, that a parcel of the Boyds’ land, hereinafter referred to as “Lot 121” is burdened with “easements” benefiting adjacent “Lot 22” owned by plaintiffs below, Frank R. McDonald and his wife Mary.
Initially, the McDonalds purchased “Lot 22” and the motel thereon from Larry and Lottie Johnson. At that time, the Johnsons owned both Lots 22 and 121 and were using a corner of Lot 121 for an alleged private extension of the motel’s driveway.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Keats v. HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hellberg v. Coffin Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Sowers v. Forest Hills SubdivisionNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Exxon Corp. v. SchutzmaierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cole v. GilvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.