City of Olympia v. Palzer
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodloe, J.
This case involves whether a tax foreclosure sale conducted by the Thurston County Treasurer extinguishes restrictive covenants which limit the manner in which a property owner in a planned unit development may use his or her land. The trial court and the Court of Appeals held that the restrictive covenants were not extinguished by the tax sale. Olympia v. Palzer, 42 Wn. App. 751, 713 P.2d 1125 (1986). We affirm.
Evergreen Park, an integrated residential-commercial planned unit development, was initially approved in 1969. It contains a greenbelt area set aside for the enjoyment and benefit of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Dominick v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Hayes v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. PrendergastNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Crawford v. SenoskyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Harris v. Ski Park Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Meresse v. StelmaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Meresse v. StelmaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Meridian Minerals Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Crescent Harbor Water Co. v. LysengCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.