Breitman v. Jaehnal
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This is a bill for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The complainants are the vendors and the defendants the vendees. The matter is submitted to me on the pleadings and an agreed state of facts. The defense to this suit is that the complainants are unable to convey a marketable title, and that there is a strong probability that the defendants will be subjecting themselves to litigation if they take title and be obliged at some future time to defend their title against claims of persons not now sui juris, and that claim is based on the facts as they appear in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Deseumeur v. RondelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- Kohlrepp v. RamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
- Roll v. EverettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Zelman v. KaufherrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- Tillotson v. GesnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kutschinski v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Scult v. Bergen Valley Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- La Salle v. La PointeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- VanDyke v. Carol Building Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Casriel v. KingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.