Dickson v. Kates

¶1 — Raymond and Theresa Dickson appeal the trial court’s decision upholding a restrictive view covenant that purported to benefit property belonging to *727their neighbors. Finding the deed conveying the restrictive covenant did not comply with the statute of frauds and that the Dicksons had no notice of restrictive covenants against their property, we reverse.

FACTS

¶2 The parties own adjoining land in Clark County. The Dicksons own tax lots 1 and 119. Don Kates and Valerie Klein1 (a married couple) own tax lot 99. This dispute arose out of a restrictive view covenant executed by both property…