Legal Opinion

Bolton v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1954No. Civ. 15973PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This action was brought by plaintiff Letty Bolton, and by her husband, Ray Bolton, for damages for the serious injuries received by Mrs. Bolton when hit by an automobile driven by defendant George Soares, who was, at the time, acting in the course and scope of his employment with the other defendants. The pleadings presented the issues of the negligence of Soares and the contributory negligence of Mrs. Bolton. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial on all statutory grounds. The trial court granted the motion by a general order that did not specify the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sloboden v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Young v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Christian v. BollsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API