Sloboden v. Time Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
In this action for personal injuries the jury returned its verdict in favor of defendant, Time Oil Company. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was granted “on the grounds that erroneous instructions were given at the time of the trial.” Defendant appeals.
It is conceded that the trial court gave, upon the request of defendant, a partially erroneous instruction on the doctrine of assumption of risk. Appellant argues its appeal as if the issue were whether the giving of this erroneous instruction was prejudicial, and assumes that the burden is on respondent to show that it was. That is not the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Hinds v. WheadonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Eramdjian v. Interstate Bakery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Gomes v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.