SAIF Corp. v. Walker
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.
In this workers’ compensation case, we must interpret the wording of ORS 656.273(1) (1995), 1 which sets out the requirements for establishing a worsened condition for the purpose of filing an aggravation claim. The Court of Appeals concluded that, under that statute, a worker must prove a “pathological” worsening of the underlying condition itself, rather than only a worsening of symptoms. SAIF v. Walker, 145 Or App 294, 305, 930 P2d 230 (1996). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that ORS 656.273(1) (1995) requires proof of a worsened condition; proof of a worsening of symptoms arising…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- A. G. v. GuitronOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Black v. ArizalaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. HaleyOregon Supreme Court · 2023
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.