DeBoard v. Meyer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
FLYNN, J. pro tempore
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that upheld employer’s denials of her claim that employer add to her accepted 2012 injury claim the new or omitted condition of disc “protrusions” in the thoracic spine. The board adopted the determination of the administrative law judge (ALJ) that claimant’s undisputed disc pathology of the thoracic spine was a degenerative disc “bulges” condition that is not “equivalent” to disc “protrusions,” and that claimant, therefore, failed to prove the existence of the claimed condition. Claimant argues that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Freightliner Corp. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- De Los-Santos v. Si Pac Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Horizon Air Industries, Inc. v. Davis-WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- SAIF Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Facebook v. S.C.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. Deboard (In re Deboard)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Marsh v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Marsh)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019