SAIF Corp. v. January
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Employer seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order allowing claimant’s aggravation claim. See ORS 656.273(1). The issue is whether claimant carried his burden to establish an “actual worsening” of his condition. As framed on review, that issue encompasses the legal question of whether claimant presented the type of evidence required to satisfy the “actual worsening” requirement, as well as the factual question of whether the Board’s finding of an “actual worsening” in this case is supported by substantial evidence. We conclude that the evidence on which the Board…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- SAIF Corp. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Taal v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Boeing Company v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Christman v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Wantowski v. Crown Cork & SealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.