Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1921No. 5823PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states ease.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

—The conviction is for violation the Medical Practice Act. (See Chap. 6, Title 12 of the Penal Code.) It is declared that it shall be unlawful for any one to practice medicine in any of its branches upon human beings, within the limits of the State, who has not complied with the provisions of the law prescribing examination and registration of certificate. Certain persons arc exempted. Among them are dentists, who confine their practice to dentistry, nurses who practice nursing only, and masseurs in their particular sphere of labor.

■The information contains the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. McNaughton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Teem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. In Re RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Singh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HalstedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Blumberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Wilson v. State Board of Naturopathic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Allison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API